Thought Leadership

From Vision to Action: How WSB Delivers Climate Plans That Work

April 17, 2026

By Mattie Anders, Sustainability Program Manager, WSB

As communities across the country work to address climate change, the challenge is no longer setting ambitious goals—it’s turning those goals into practical, actionable plans. Effective climate planning starts with a clear, data‑driven understanding of a community’s emissions, risks, and priorities—and that’s exactly how WSB approaches every project. Drawing from industry best practices, we begin by establishing a strong foundation: developing greenhouse gas inventories, identifying climate vulnerabilities, and aligning goals with state and regional targets. This analytical groundwork ensures that climate strategies are rooted in real conditions, not assumptions, and sets communities up to make informed, high-impact decisions. This approach has been successfully applied in local communities like Mahtomedi, St. Anthony Village, and Circle Pines, where WSB has supported the development of tailored, actionable climate and sustainability plans.

But data alone doesn’t create meaningful change – people do. WSB places a strong emphasis on intentional, right-sized engagement that brings residents, businesses, and stakeholders into the process in a way that is accessible and actionable. Transparent, inclusive engagement improves outcomes and builds long-term support for implementation, and we tailor our approach to meet each community where they are. Whether through targeted surveys, stakeholder workshops, or focused conversations, we ensure that local knowledge and priorities directly shape the plan, without overburdening staff or budgets.

Finally, WSB’s climate plans are designed to move beyond vision into implementation. We integrate climate strategies into existing city processes, like capital improvement planning, policy updates, and infrastructure investments, so sustainability becomes part of everyday decision-making, not a standalone effort. By pairing technical expertise with practical, community-focused solutions, we deliver plans that are not only ambitious, but achievable, helping communities take meaningful steps toward a more resilient, low-carbon future this Earth Day and beyond.

How Cities Are Measuring What Matters: Transportation Sustainability Assessments and the Future of Urban Infrastructure

April 17, 2026

By Katie Baum, Sustainability Program Planner, WSB 

For decades, cities measured transportation performance using a narrow set of indicators, including vehicle counts, travel times, and pavement conditions. But as urban areas grapple with changing climate conditions, equitable demands, aging infrastructure, and constrained budgets, a more sophisticated question has emerged: Is our transportation system actually working for people, the environment, and the economy all at once? Transportation Sustainability Assessments (TSAs) attempt to answer exactly that.

What Transportation Sustainability Assessments Measure and Why It Matters

At their core, Transportation Sustainability Assessments evaluate a transportation system across three interconnected dimensions: environmental performance, social equity, and economic viability. Rather than asking only how fast vehicles can move through a corridor, a TSA asks harder questions about who has access, what the system emits, who bears the burden of its impacts, and whether the investment is viable over the long term. A 2021 systematic review published in Transport Reviews examined 99 peer reviewed studies and identified nearly 2,400 unique sustainability indicators in use across the field, a figure that speaks both to the richness of the concept and to the challenge of standardizing it.

Common Methods Cities Use to Measure Transportation Sustainability

The most common assessment approaches fall into several broad categories, each offering distinct value to practitioners. Indicator and framework development is the most widely used method, characterizing nearly a third of published assessments, and produces structured tools that cities can apply to evaluate and report on their transportation systems over time. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis is particularly valuable when a city needs to compare alternative investments or policies, using weighted sustainability criteria and stakeholder input to generate ranked, defensible priorities. Modeling and simulation tools allow cities to project the sustainability impacts of future decisions before committing capital, comparing outcomes such as the long-term emissions reduction of a transit investment against roadway expansion. The most advanced assessments identified in the literature were those that paired quantitative performance data with genuine community engagement, incorporating the perspectives of residents whose lived experience of the transportation system may differ significantly from what the data alone reveals.

How Transportation Sustainability Assessments Support Smarter, More Equitable Infrastructure Decisions

For smaller and mid-sized cities navigating complex transportation contexts, including industrial freight corridors, environmental justice communities, and limited staff capacity, the practical lesson from the literature is clear: start with a framework grounded in local policy goals, invest meaningfully in stakeholder engagement, and resist the temptation to default to easy-to-measure indicators at the expense of qualitative dimensions. When done well, a Transportation Sustainability Assessment establishes a measurable baseline that enables long term accountability, allowing cities to track progress against adopted sustainability goals and demonstrate outcomes to funders, policymakers, and the communities they serve. A TSA can transform transportation planning from a technical exercise into a genuine act of community investment, one that ensures infrastructure decisions reflect the specific conditions, values, and priorities of the people a city exists to serve.

Sources: Karjalainen, L.E. & Juhola, S. (2021). Urban transportation sustainability assessments: a systematic review of literature. Transport Reviews, 41(5), 659–684.

How Cities Can Reduce Environmental Impact Through Infrastructure Decisions

April 7, 2026

By Ben Fletcher, Design Manager, WSB 

Earth Month is often associated with big-picture sustainability goals, but for city and county staff, real environmental impact is driven by everyday infrastructure decisions. From how roads are designed to how projects are coordinated across departments, practical choices made during planning, design, and construction can significantly reduce environmental impact —while also saving time and money. 

One of the most effective ways communities can advance sustainability is by prioritizing on long-term asset performance rather than short-term fixes. Infrastructure that is designed with lifecycle planning in mind lasts longer, requires fewer repairs, and reduces the need for frequent reconstruction. This approach not only saves on materials and lowers greenhouse gas emissions associated with construction but also minimizes disruptions to residents and businesses. Over time, a lifecycle approach delivers stronger fiscal stewardship, improved service reliability, and more sustainable outcomes for the whole community. 

Data-driven planning also plays a critical role. The greatest impact occurs when sustainability is embedded directly into capital improvement planning rather than treated as a separate initiative. Using condition data, asset inventories, and readily available environmental datasets, communities can prioritize investments based on demonstrated need, not assumptions or the loudest complaint. This approach allows limited resources to be directed where they deliver the greatest impact to your community, extending the lifespan of roads, utilities, and facilities while reducing unnecessary construction and environmental disturbance. Integrating environmental considerations into routine planning processes enables more consistent, informed decision-making without adding complexity to already busy workloads. 

Another opportunity lies in project coordination. When Aligning roadway, utility, and facility improvements are aligned through data-informed capital planning, communities can avoid repeat excavation and construction impacts. Coordinated investments reduce disruptions to citizens, businesses, traffic, and neighborhoods, while also limiting impacts on natural resources. This integrated approach not only improves overall project efficiency, but also maximizes the value of public investments, ensuring that infrastructure upgrades are strategic, cost-effective, and aligned with long-term sustainability goals. 

Finally, education is the key to success. When both leadership and frontline staff understand how their day-to-day decisions influence long-term asset performance, costs, and environmental outcomes, sustainability becomes embedded in routine operations – not treated as an add-on. Building this shared awareness empowers teams to apply lifecycle thinking, use data effectively, and coordinate projects more strategically. The result is more consistent, informed decision-making that drives cost-effective investments, reduces environmental impact, and reinforces a culture of sustainability across an organization.  

Earth Month is a reminder that sustainability and resilience go hand in hand. By understanding and respecting natural systems, local governments can build infrastructure that lasts longer, performs better, and serves communities well into the future. WSB partners with cities and counties to plan, design, educate and deliver infrastructure that works with those natural systems to reduce risk and build long-term resilience. Our teams bring together geotechnical, environmental, stormwater, and resilience planning expertise to help communities make informed decisions early, before challenges become costly problems, protecting their infrastructure, their environment, and the people who rely on them. 

Resilient Communities Start with the Ground Beneath Them

April 7, 2026

By Shawn Poe, Director of Municipal Services, WSB

As communities recognize Earth Month, it’s a good time to reflect on how working with natural systems, rather than against them, can lead to more resilient, sustainable infrastructure. Understanding the ground beneath and around our roads, utilities, and public facilities is one of the most important steps in reducing risk and protecting the environment. 

Early insight into soil, groundwater, and site conditions helps communities make informed decisions before design and construction begin. Geotechnical and environmental evaluations identify challenges that could otherwise lead to premature failures, environmental damage, or costly change orders later in a project’s life. Addressing these conditions early supports both sustainability and fiscal responsibility. 

Stormwater management is another area where thoughtful planning has an outsized impact. Designing infrastructure that manages runoff effectively helps protect local waterways, reduce erosion, and comply with regulatory requirements. When stormwater systems are integrated into broader planning efforts, they contribute to healthier ecosystems and more resilient neighborhoods. 

Communities are also increasingly focused on reducing construction-related environmental impacts. Better site planning, informed material selection, and coordinated construction oversight can limit disturbance to surrounding areas and shorten construction timelines, benefiting residents, staff, and the environment alike. 

Finally, resilient infrastructure is essential as communities prepare for extreme weather and changing climate conditions as natural hazard events grow in frequency and intensity.  Cities and counties that use both thoughtful community engagement and hazard-specific data to understand their unique vulnerability and exposure are better prepared to protect critical assets while supporting public safety and environmental stewardship. 

At WSB, we help cities and counties reduce uncertainty by identifying risks early and addressing them before they affect project outcomes. Through integrated hazard mitigation planning, geotechnical, environmental, stormwater, and construction-phase support, we assist communities in navigating complex site conditions, regulatory requirements, and evolving climate challenges. Our teams focus on practical implementation, helping local governments move from planning to construction with fewer surprises, better coordination, and infrastructure that performs as intended for the long term. 

Earth Month 2026: Inspiration from Tribal Collaboration 

April 2, 2026

By Amy Fredregill, Sr. Director of Sustainability, WSB

As we kick off Earth Month 2026, I am reflecting on the collaboration between partners in the Tribal Nations of MN. We have had the opportunity to support idea-sharing on environmental issues between sovereign nations in dozens of ways since last year’s Earth Month celebration, and wanted to share some of my top takeaways. These observations have occurred because over the last year, we at WSB have served as technical assistance providers to MN tribes on behalf of the MN Pollution Control Agency on a multitude of environmental and energy-related efforts. This role has provided us the opportunity to connect with community leaders across disciplines, in different jurisdictions, and around the state.  

Each Tribal Nation advances their own vision of sovereignty for their community. In many instances, they also collaborate with other Tribal Nations across areas of expertise and lived experiences. These conversations have covered such varied topics as sustainable farming, local foods, renewable energy, land conservation, climate protection, water quality improvements, and beyond.  

By coming together, we reinforce and demonstrate an attitude of abundance, instead of scarcity. There are many environmental challenges, and by coming together to share ideas, lessons learned, best practices and resources, we can turn the challenges into opportunities for innovation, growth, community-building and vitality.  

A specific example of fruitful collaboration is demonstrated by the work of the Tribal Advisory Council on Energy, or TACE. This relatively new organization brings together MN Tribal Nations to advance energy sovereignty. TACE members share best practices on renewable energy, collaborate on local community projects, advise on stakeholder conversations with policymakers and utilities, and beyond. By adding capacity and expertise to common efforts, TACE supports its members to go farther, faster, together. 

This Earth Month, you will be hearing more stories from WSB leaders about energy planning, nature-based solutions, coastal resiliency, climate modelling integration into comprehensive planning, and beyond.  We learn by working across systems, communities, cultures and sectors. I am excited to see how these recently planted seeds will grow, and hope to do my part in cultivating these robust conversations. I’m putting a “green flag” in these efforts to circle back over time and observe the cycles of growth, adaptation, calibration, and learnings. 

BRIC Is Back: What City Staff Need to Know Now 

By Allison Whitsitt, Director, Emergency Management, WSB

March 26, 2026

FEMA has officially released the FY 2025 and FY 2026 Building Resilient Infrastructure in Communities (BRIC) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), marking a major restart of the program and a significant shift in priorities, eligibility, and scoring. With $1 billion available nationwide, BRIC remains one of the most impactful federal funding opportunities for communities looking to reduce risk and invest in resilient infrastructure, but success will depend on readiness and alignment with the new rules. 

What’s Changed in the FY25–26 BRIC NOFO 

• Project cap reduced: Maximum federal share per National Competition project is now $20 million (down from $50 million) 

• Hazard Mitigation Plans (HMPs):  

• A FEMA-approved State or Tribal HMP is required by the application deadline and at the time of obligation 

• Plan development or updates are no longer eligible costs 

• HMP integration is encouraged, projects should clearly reference where needs appear in the plan 

• Phased projects are no longer eligible 

• Construction readiness is heavily weighted:  

• Projects at 90%+ design earn 30 of 90 possible points in the National Competition 

• Advancing design prior to submission is critical 

Available Funding Snapshot 

• Total BRIC funding: $1,000,000,000 

• National Competition: $757,000,000 (cap of $20,000,000 per project) 

• State/Territory allocation: $112,000,000 

• Tribal set-aside: $50,000,000 

• Building code plus-ups:  

• $56,000,000 (State/Territory) 

• $25,000,000 (Tribal) 

• Pre–award application costs are eligible 

Key Dates to Know 

• Application opens: March 25, 2026 (3:00 p.m. ET) 

• FEMA deadline: July 23, 2026 (3:00 p.m. ET) 

• State deadlines: Typically 4–8 weeks earlier (varies by state) 

• Period of performance: 36 months (limited extensions) 

Eligible Projects & Cost Share 

• Eligible activities include:  

• Infrastructure-focused hazard mitigation projects 

• Capability and capacity-building activities that directly support infrastructure (e.g., building code adoption, project scoping) 

• Grant management costs 

• Cost share:  

• 75% federal / 25% nonfederal (standard) 

• 90% / 10% for small, impoverished communities 

• Up to 100% federal for certain insular area awards under $200,000 

How Projects Will Be Evaluated 

• Infrastructure project readiness and constructability 

• Risk reduction outcomes and useful life 

• Strong Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) 

• Building code adoption and enforcement 

• Consideration for new applicants and small or disadvantaged communities 

• Environmental considerations, future conditions, NEPA, and clear go/nogo milestones 

What Cities Should Do Now 

• Identify infrastructure mitigation projects that can reach advanced design quickly 

• Confirm HMP status and clearly link project needs to plan priorities 

• Validate match funding and BCA assumptions early 

• Coordinate internally to ensure federal procurement requirements are followed from the start 

• Prepare for earlier state deadlines, not just the FEMA deadline 

How WSB Can Help 

WSB has experience helping communities successfully pursue BRIC funding—from early strategy and readiness assessments to application development and implementation. In the past, our team partnered with the City of Tulsa to secure the first competitive BRIC award in Region 6, a $24 million investment in resilient infrastructure. As BRIC moves forward under its new structure, WSB can help cities evaluate competitiveness, advance project readiness, and align applications with FEMA’s updated priorities—so resilient infrastructure projects move from concept to construction. 

Q&A with Pete Helder | Director, Survey

Pete Helder is Director of Survey at WSB, with more than 35 years of experience in the survey and construction industry. Pete has led surveying efforts across municipal, land development, energy and infrastructure projects, with expertise in ALTA/NSPS Land Title surveys, boundary and topographic surveys and right‑of‑way platting. His background includes coordinating survey crews, supporting design for streets and subdivisions and delivering clear, defensible survey information that supports ownership, access and construction decisions. Pete brings a practical, detail‑driven approach to his work and continues to build trusted client relationships through consistent delivery and technical leadership.

What Do You Enjoy Most About Surveying?

What I enjoy most about surveying is the mix of precision, problem-solving, and people. I especially enjoy ALTA/NSPS land title surveys and boundary surveys because they require you to be thorough—researching record documents, weighing evidence in the field, and then turning all of that into a clear deliverable that a title company, lender, owner, and design team can rely on. I like the challenge of resolving questions before they become issues, and I take pride in producing work that is defensible and easy for others to use. As of the past 6 years or so I genuinely enjoy the client development side of survey— building relationships, understanding what a client needs from the survey, and being the person they trust to deliver consistently.

What is the Significance of Surveying?

Surveying is critical because it establishes a reliable source of truth for property and design decisions. For ALTA and boundary work, which means providing certainty around ownership, access, easements, encroachments, and improvements—information that directly supports title, financing, due diligence, and risk management. On the design and construction side, accurate control and topographic information keep teams aligned, reduce rework, and help projects get built where they’re supposed to be. When the survey is right and clearly communicated, it prevents disputes, saves time and money, and gives every stakeholder confidence to move forward.

What Inspired You to Pursue a Career in Surveying?

I was drawn to surveying because it fits how I like to work: hands-on and detail-oriented, with real responsibility behind the finished product. I like that surveying combines field work, record research, and technology, and that good judgment matters as much as good measurements. As I got more exposure to ALTA and boundary surveys, I realized I enjoyed this type of work the most, tracking down the right documents, reconciling record information with field evidence, and producing a map that tells the story clearly. Over time, the client-facing part became just as rewarding; listening to what a client is trying to accomplish and delivering a survey they can trust for decisions and deadlines.

What is a Project You Enjoyed Working On?

One project I especially enjoyed was the Catalina I & II Solar Project—it was our first utility-scale solar project in California. It was exciting because it combined the parts of surveying I like most: careful boundary and records work, efficient field execution over a large site, and strong communication with the broader project team plus I got to travel there weekly while it was freezing cold here in Minnesota. With a project of that scale, there’s a lot riding on getting the boundary, access, and existing conditions documented clearly so the owner, engineers, and contractors can make decisions with confidence. I enjoyed being part of a team that helped set the groundwork for a successful build, and it was rewarding to see our survey work directly support the project as it moved forward.

Top 3 Ways Technology Is Strengthening Bridge Programs for DOTs and Communities

By Kevin Anderson, Vice President, Structures, WSB

Across the nation, bridge owners face familiar yet evolving pressures: aging structures, demanding corridors, environmental uncertainty, and rising expectations for safe, resilient infrastructure delivered quickly and transparently. Technology is reshaping how agencies respond — not by replacing engineering expertise, but by expanding what teams can anticipate, coordinate, and deliver. Through our work nationwide, three technology‑driven approaches consistently strengthen bridge programs.

1) Modeling Tools That Reduce Construction Risk Before Work Begins

Bridge work is rarely straightforward. Mountain corridors in Colorado bring steep grades, rockfall zones, and limited access. Urban centers in Georgia compress construction into tight rights‑of‑way surrounded by traffic and multimodal networks. Coastal regions in Florida introduce tidal conditions, storm surge risks, and sensitive environments. Each setting demands its own considerations — and modeling helps reveal them early.

With advanced 3D and 4D tools, WSB teams simulate how a bridge interacts with its surroundings long before construction begins. Digital models capture staging sequences, utility conflicts, structure geometry, rail coordination, hydrology, and traffic operations, giving owners a clear view of potential challenges.

This process naturally engages WSB’s geotechnical, water resources, traffic, environmental, and construction specialists, ensuring decisions reflect the full complexity of the corridor. Early insight leads to greater predictability, fewer field surprises, and solutions aligned with the terrain and community.

2) Data‑Driven Insight for Smarter Planning and Long‑Term Stewardship

Reliable data is transforming how agencies understand their networks. Tools like GIS, LiDAR, digital inspections, and asset management systems support a shift from reactive maintenance to informed, long‑term planning. These technologies help identify structural trends, pinpoint vulnerabilities, and evaluate risk consistently.

Data becomes even more powerful when interpreted through a multidisciplinary lens. Bridges sit at the intersection of mobility, hydrology, geology, utilities, and community development. Drawing on 50+ service areas, WSB teams assess how changing flood patterns might affect piers, how soils influence deterioration, how traffic growth stresses a corridor, or how development reshapes access.

When bridge data aligns with insights from planning, environmental compliance, stormwater modeling, materials testing, and more, agencies can prioritize projects with confidence and invest in safer, more resilient infrastructure.

3) Digital Delivery That Strengthens Coordination and Accelerates Progress

Bridge programs today operate under accelerated schedules, heightened public scrutiny, and complex stakeholder expectations. Digital delivery brings clarity and momentum to the process.

Cloud‑based collaboration, automated documentation, digital plan sets, and real‑time design review tools connect project partners and reduce friction. Contractors gain clearer design intent. Designers understand field conditions faster. DOT reviewers access consistent, up‑to‑date information. Construction engineering and inspection teams verify work with greater accuracy.

WSB’s digital workflows span all service areas, creating continuity from concept through construction. Survey updates feed directly into engineering models, environmental changes appear immediately in design reviews, traffic data informs staging, and public engagement materials draw directly from project models. Fewer handoffs and faster decisions keep projects moving.

Technology That Strengthens More Than Bridges

While these innovations improve bridge delivery, their true impact lies in how they connect to the broader transportation system. Bridges influence — and are influenced by — roadway geometry, hydrology, utilities, mobility needs, permitting, construction methods, and long‑term maintenance. Technology enables these relationships to be understood earlier and addressed holistically.

WSB’s multidisciplinary foundation strengthens this work. Our bridge and structures teams collaborate seamlessly with colleagues in transportation planning, geotechnical engineering, water resources, environmental sciences, GIS, construction services, and more to deliver solutions that consider the entire corridor and community.

The result is more than a well‑delivered bridge — it’s a stronger, safer, more resilient system that supports communities now and into the future.

Response & Recovery: Helping Communities Bounce Back Faster

By Keaton Forrest, Field Manager Emergency Management Services, WSB

When an emergency hits, timing, coordination, and communication matter more than ever. Effective response and recovery efforts protect lives, stabilize essential systems, and reduce long-term financial impacts. Strong processes also support residents’ confidence and ensure that the community can rebuild more quickly and more resiliently.

What Is Response and Recovery?

Cities face two critical phases during disasters: immediate action and long-term rebuilding. Response includes lifesaving operations, damage assessments, and rapid activation of emergency systems. Recovery involves restoring infrastructure, securing reimbursement, and guiding the long-term rebuilding needed to make the community stronger.

Benefits for Local Governments

Local governments carry the largest operational burden during emergencies — but the right support can significantly reduce stress, cost, and complexity. Effective response and recovery increase clarity, speed, and financial sustainability.

• Faster situational awareness: Realtime assessments support quick, accurate decision making.
• Stronger incident command support: Helps cities maintain order and coordination under pressure.
• Accurate FEMA documentation: Maximizes reimbursement and reduces financial risk.
• Efficient resource allocation: Ensure staffing, equipment, and communications operate effectively.
• Smarter long‑term rebuilding: Supports stronger, more resilient infrastructure for the future.

Benefits for Residents

Residents experience the direct impact of a city’s response and recovery work. Fast, coordinated efforts help reduce fear, protect property, and restore a sense of normalcy as quickly as possible.

• Faster restoration of utilities and essential services
• Quicker debris removal and safer mobility
• More reliable emergency communication and updates
• Shorter recovery periods for critical public infrastructure
• A stronger, safer community after reconstruction

How We Support Cities

From the first hours of an emergency to the final stages of rebuilding, our team provides end-to-end support designed for effectiveness and clarity. We help cities manage complexity so staff can focus on serving residents.

• Rapid damage assessments
• Debris monitoring and FEMA compliant documentation
• Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and incident command staffing
• Long‑term recovery planning and paperwork management
• Guidance on rebuilding, grant development, and infrastructure improvements

Partner With Us

In the most difficult moments a community can face, having the right experts at your side makes all the difference. Our team provides disaster response and recovery support through rapid assessments, documentation expertise, EOC staffing, debris monitoring, and long-term recovery planning. We understand FEMA’s processes inside and out, ensuring your city captures every eligible dollar while reducing the administrative burden on already stretched staff. Our approach blends technical expertise, field-tested response skills, and a deep commitment to helping cities recover stronger than before.

Cities count on us because we bring clarity to chaotic moments, accelerate recovery timelines, and ensure rebuilding is done with resilience in mind. We stand ready to support your community from the first hours of response through the final stages of reconstruction. Contact us today to learn how our response and recovery experts can support your city when it matters most.

Pavement Management: The Cornerstone of Asset Health 

By: Shannon McGrath, Director, Asset Management Planning, WSB and Shuvo Islam, Asset Management Lead, WSB

Communities rely on their streets, trails, and corridors every single day and pavement is often the most valuable and most visible asset that cities manage. However, it’s also one of the fastest to deteriorate if not maintained strategically. 

As infrastructure ages and budgets tighten, more municipalities are turning to preventive approaches to pavement management as a foundational step in strengthening their overall asset portfolio. When leaders understand the true condition of their pavements and how those pavements are likely to age over time, they gain the insight needed to prioritize investments, reduce long-term costs ensuring serviceable roads for the community, and plan with confidence. 

Building Smarter, Not Just Smoother 

Traditional approaches often focus on fixing the worst roads first. While intuitive, this reactive approach leads to escalating costs and unpredictable spending. Modern pavement management flips that script by identifying where early, low-cost preventive treatments can extend pavement life and delay the need for costly major reconstruction. 

It’s a simple truth: Protecting good roads before they fail saves communities significant money down the line.

WSB supports this shift by combining engineering expertise with modern tools to deliver clear, defensible insight into pavement condition and need. 

A More Advanced, Accurate Approach 

Advances in technology now allow communities to assess pavement networks with greater accuracy and consistency. WSB incorporates: 

• Automated condition data collection to reduce subjectivity 

• AI supported distress identification for improved accuracy and efficiency 

• Customized deterioration modeling based on local climate, traffic, and materials 

• GIS integrated inventory management to better inform capital planning and communication to strengthen capital planning and coordination 

• Integration into enterprise asset management systems (EAMS) to coordinate with other asset needs, such as underground utilities 

While tools and automation are accelerating the work, engineering oversight remains essential. Our team validates results, interprets the data, develops performance models, and collaborates with clients to translate findings into practical treatment strategies. 

Driving Better Decisions and Better Outcomes 

With a strong pavement management program, communities can: 

• Improve overall network condition 

• Prioritize projects with confidence 

• Stretch limited dollars further 

• Reduce emergency repairs and service disruptions 

• Coordinate street work with underground utility needs 

• Build more predictable, transparent capital plans 

For municipal leaders, these benefits directly support safer streets, better experiences for residents, and more resilient infrastructure. 

Strengthening Your Community’s Foundation 

Pavement is more than a surface; it’s the backbone of mobility, commerce, and daily life. A thoughtful, data driven pavement management strategy gives communities a powerful tool to protect that backbone and invest wisely in the future. 

If your city is looking to modernize its approach, improve performance, or align limited resources with long-term goals, our team at WSB is here to help.